#148 Minnesota-Duluth (5-7)

avg: 1161.01  •  sd: 122.2  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
274 DePaul Win 12-8 1053.85 Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
65 Indiana Loss 9-12 1220.48 Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
366 Wisconsin-Oshkosh** Win 13-3 -15.56 Ignored Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
35 Missouri Loss 7-11 1319.93 Mar 5th Midwest Throwdown 2023
146 Kansas Win 11-9 1418.09 Mar 5th Midwest Throwdown 2023
88 Central Florida Win 11-10 1559.22 Mar 11th Tally Classic XVII
91 Tulane Loss 4-13 830.19 Mar 11th Tally Classic XVII
201 South Florida Win 9-8 1062.69 Mar 11th Tally Classic XVII
110 Clemson Loss 10-11 1197.2 Mar 11th Tally Classic XVII
49 Notre Dame Loss 14-15 1518.26 Mar 12th Tally Classic XVII
110 Clemson Loss 7-12 801.69 Mar 12th Tally Classic XVII
104 Florida State Loss 8-14 808.97 Mar 12th Tally Classic XVII
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)