#348 Cornell-B (4-7)

avg: 76.83  •  sd: 84.83  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
176 Syracuse** Loss 1-13 447.79 Ignored Mar 4th No Sleep Till Brooklyn 2023
298 Hofstra Win 8-7 597.11 Mar 4th No Sleep Till Brooklyn 2023
169 NYU** Loss 2-13 483.8 Ignored Mar 4th No Sleep Till Brooklyn 2023
298 Hofstra Loss 3-12 -127.89 Mar 5th No Sleep Till Brooklyn 2023
299 Western New England Loss 6-11 -81.19 Mar 5th No Sleep Till Brooklyn 2023
337 Maryland-B Loss 11-12 77.22 Apr 1st Atlantic Coast Open 2023
363 George Washington-B Win 12-1 217.72 Apr 1st Atlantic Coast Open 2023
361 Georgetown-B Win 7-6 -121.19 Apr 1st Atlantic Coast Open 2023
367 American-B** Win 13-4 -330.99 Ignored Apr 2nd Atlantic Coast Open 2023
258 South Carolina-B** Loss 1-13 98.2 Ignored Apr 2nd Atlantic Coast Open 2023
311 Virginia Tech-B Loss 9-12 12.69 Apr 2nd Atlantic Coast Open 2023
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)