#272 Ohio (5-7)

avg: 619.98  •  sd: 81.94  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
319 Akron Win 13-4 915.2 Mar 4th Huckin in the Hills IX
139 Dayton Loss 4-13 598.09 Mar 4th Huckin in the Hills IX
181 West Virginia Loss 4-9 414.57 Mar 4th Huckin in the Hills IX
364 SUNY-Buffalo-B** Win 13-2 165.91 Ignored Mar 4th Huckin in the Hills IX
128 SUNY-Buffalo Loss 7-9 980.07 Mar 5th Huckin in the Hills IX
181 West Virginia Loss 5-15 414.57 Mar 5th Huckin in the Hills IX
328 Marquette-B Win 6-5 403.63 Apr 1st Illinois Invite1
199 Nebraska Loss 1-10 345.12 Apr 1st Illinois Invite1
279 Wisconsin-Platteville Loss 5-6 460.54 Apr 1st Illinois Invite1
313 Illinois-B Win 11-5 954.3 Apr 2nd Illinois Invite1
301 Purdue-B Win 11-7 911.3 Apr 2nd Illinois Invite1
215 North Park Loss 2-7 281.54 Apr 2nd Illinois Invite1
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)