#400 Arizona State-C (1-6)

avg: 221.92  •  sd: 89.11  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
123 New Mexico** Loss 2-11 679.41 Ignored Jan 26th New Year Fest 2019
289 Brigham Young-B Loss 4-11 111.02 Jan 26th New Year Fest 2019
382 Air Force-B Loss 11-12 181.13 Jan 26th New Year Fest 2019
273 Colorado State-B Loss 4-11 175.73 Jan 26th New Year Fest 2019
222 Grand Canyon** Loss 4-11 319.88 Ignored Jan 26th New Year Fest 2019
403 Texas-El Paso Win 5-3 608.82 Jan 26th New Year Fest 2019
388 Arizona-B Loss 11-12 155.79 Jan 27th New Year Fest 2019
**Blowout Eligible


The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)