#27 Northeastern (5-10)

avg: 1682.45  •  sd: 66.34  •  top 16/20: 17%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
4 Texas Loss 8-13 1525.35 Feb 3rd Florida Warm Up 2023
106 Florida State Win 13-3 1760.45 Feb 3rd Florida Warm Up 2023
18 Brown Win 15-12 2046.65 Feb 4th Florida Warm Up 2023
12 Carleton College Loss 11-13 1634.65 Feb 4th Florida Warm Up 2023
21 Georgia Loss 8-9 1611.32 Feb 4th Florida Warm Up 2023
11 Pittsburgh Loss 6-13 1267.72 Feb 4th Florida Warm Up 2023
58 Auburn Win 13-6 2000.05 Feb 5th Florida Warm Up 2023
5 Vermont Loss 8-13 1514.55 Feb 5th Florida Warm Up 2023
10 Minnesota Loss 10-12 1650.44 Mar 4th Smoky Mountain Invite
11 Pittsburgh Loss 9-11 1618.51 Mar 4th Smoky Mountain Invite
14 UCLA Loss 9-12 1485.46 Mar 4th Smoky Mountain Invite
18 Brown Loss 9-15 1230.68 Mar 5th Smoky Mountain Invite
1 Massachusetts Loss 9-13 1801.68 Mar 5th Smoky Mountain Invite
15 North Carolina State Win 15-12 2105.78 Mar 5th Smoky Mountain Invite
19 Ohio State Win 15-13 1960.05 Mar 5th Smoky Mountain Invite
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)