#255 Harding (11-10)

avg: 367.13  •  sd: 65.14  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
267 Memphis Win 13-3 865.33 Jan 21st Tupelo Tuneup
117 Mississippi State** Loss 1-13 475.61 Ignored Jan 21st Tupelo Tuneup
259 Southern Mississippi Loss 6-10 -159.64 Jan 21st Tupelo Tuneup
- Rhodes College** Win 13-3 300.92 Ignored Jan 21st Tupelo Tuneup
211 Alabama-Birmingham Win 9-8 733.09 Jan 22nd Tupelo Tuneup
306 Mississippi College Win 7-1 383.55 Jan 22nd Tupelo Tuneup
254 Alabama-B Loss 8-12 -71.08 Jan 23rd Tupelo Tuneup
254 Alabama-B Win 8-6 670.57 Feb 18th ‘Ole Muddy Classic
211 Alabama-Birmingham Loss 6-11 61.4 Feb 18th ‘Ole Muddy Classic
306 Mississippi College Win 11-7 250.44 Feb 18th ‘Ole Muddy Classic
284 Mississippi State-B Win 11-7 596.3 Feb 18th ‘Ole Muddy Classic
254 Alabama-B Loss 9-13 -48.49 Feb 19th ‘Ole Muddy Classic
306 Mississippi College Win 13-4 383.55 Feb 19th ‘Ole Muddy Classic
284 Mississippi State-B Win 11-3 729.4 Feb 19th ‘Ole Muddy Classic
217 Baylor Loss 8-13 63.5 Feb 25th Dust Bowl 2023
100 Arkansas** Loss 5-13 573.48 Ignored Feb 25th Dust Bowl 2023
189 North Texas Loss 6-9 309.03 Feb 25th Dust Bowl 2023
162 Wichita State Loss 6-13 299.42 Feb 25th Dust Bowl 2023
260 Texas A&M-B Win 12-7 854.11 Feb 26th Dust Bowl 2023
234 Texas-B Loss 6-8 160.82 Feb 26th Dust Bowl 2023
249 Oklahoma State Win 9-8 524.39 Feb 26th Dust Bowl 2023
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)