#270 Wake Forest (3-9)

avg: 648.04  •  sd: 65.5  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
140 Cedarville Loss 3-13 588.18 Feb 18th Commonwealth Cup Weekend1 2023
194 Christopher Newport Loss 11-12 833.07 Feb 18th Commonwealth Cup Weekend1 2023
273 Michigan-B Win 13-10 943.7 Feb 18th Commonwealth Cup Weekend1 2023
200 North Carolina-B Loss 5-13 339.77 Feb 18th Commonwealth Cup Weekend1 2023
273 Michigan-B Win 13-9 1034.13 Feb 19th Commonwealth Cup Weekend1 2023
308 Virginia-B Win 13-9 820.93 Feb 19th Commonwealth Cup Weekend1 2023
182 Berry Loss 5-12 413.88 Mar 25th Needle in a Ho Stack2
107 Tennessee Loss 6-13 741.72 Mar 25th Needle in a Ho Stack2
211 Embry-Riddle Loss 10-12 656.31 Mar 25th Needle in a Ho Stack2
133 Davidson Loss 7-13 680.63 Mar 25th Needle in a Ho Stack2
- High Point Loss 6-9 263.1 Mar 26th Needle in a Ho Stack2
258 South Carolina-B Loss 8-9 573.2 Mar 26th Needle in a Ho Stack2
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)