#72 RIT (8-5)

avg: 1350.15  •  sd: 53.32  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
135 Boston University Win 8-7 1146.33 Jan 28th Mid Atlantic Warmup
51 James Madison Loss 8-9 1312.21 Jan 28th Mid Atlantic Warmup
74 Binghamton Win 11-8 1684.22 Jan 28th Mid Atlantic Warmup
235 Drexel** Win 13-4 1170.94 Ignored Jan 28th Mid Atlantic Warmup
151 Johns Hopkins Win 15-7 1557.59 Jan 29th Mid Atlantic Warmup
39 William & Mary Loss 13-14 1410.44 Jan 29th Mid Atlantic Warmup
74 Binghamton Loss 11-13 1089.77 Jan 29th Mid Atlantic Warmup
183 Maine Win 13-7 1371.67 Mar 11th Oak Creek Invite 2023
67 Maryland Loss 11-12 1245.03 Mar 11th Oak Creek Invite 2023
173 SUNY-Geneseo Win 12-8 1315.48 Mar 11th Oak Creek Invite 2023
167 SUNY-Cortland Win 13-4 1496.63 Mar 11th Oak Creek Invite 2023
101 Liberty Win 11-8 1555.17 Mar 12th Oak Creek Invite 2023
65 Princeton Loss 9-12 1028.96 Mar 12th Oak Creek Invite 2023
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)