#157 Massachusetts-Lowell (14-5)

avg: 933.51  •  sd: 67.39  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
98 Massachusetts-B Loss 5-11 601.06 Feb 11th UMass Invite 2023
165 Tufts-B Win 9-7 1193.95 Feb 11th UMass Invite 2023
199 Northeastern-B Loss 5-8 284.33 Feb 11th UMass Invite 2023
300 Hofstra** Win 13-1 782.77 Ignored Feb 11th UMass Invite 2023
195 Amherst Win 15-4 1355.98 Feb 12th UMass Invite 2023
92 Vermont-B Loss 9-15 726.09 Feb 12th UMass Invite 2023
300 Hofstra** Win 15-5 782.77 Ignored Feb 12th UMass Invite 2023
165 Tufts-B Loss 6-7 789.62 Feb 12th UMass Invite 2023
161 Bates Win 10-9 1049.1 Mar 18th Mill City Throwdown1
- Boston College Win 11-10 1140.75 Mar 18th Mill City Throwdown1
118 Williams Loss 5-15 493.04 Mar 18th Mill City Throwdown1
- Wentworth Win 11-10 645.97 Mar 18th Mill City Throwdown1
161 Bates Win 8-7 1049.1 Mar 25th New England Open1
254 Worcester Polytech Win 11-5 1087.2 Mar 25th New England Open1
325 Northeastern-C** Win 13-4 532.95 Ignored Mar 25th New England Open1
293 Connecticut-B** Win 13-1 835.77 Ignored Mar 25th New England Open1
161 Bates Win 11-8 1289.7 Mar 26th New England Open1
313 Harvard-B** Win 13-2 685.19 Ignored Mar 26th New England Open1
254 Worcester Polytech Win 11-3 1087.2 Mar 26th New England Open1
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)