#272 Georgia Tech-B (3-8)

avg: 401.52  •  sd: 54.3  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
319 Mary Washington Win 13-11 275.87 Feb 18th Commonwealth Cup Weekend1 2023
126 Elon Loss 6-13 462.54 Feb 18th Commonwealth Cup Weekend1 2023
175 West Virginia Loss 8-10 601.31 Feb 18th Commonwealth Cup Weekend1 2023
144 Franciscan Loss 3-13 381 Feb 19th Commonwealth Cup Weekend1 2023
175 West Virginia Loss 1-13 263.98 Feb 19th Commonwealth Cup Weekend1 2023
188 Luther Loss 5-13 196.21 Mar 18th College Southerns XXI
- Florida Gulf Coast University Win 9-8 422.97 Mar 18th College Southerns XXI
238 Georgia College Win 9-7 826.76 Mar 18th College Southerns XXI
142 Carleton College-CHOP Loss 7-12 472.9 Mar 19th College Southerns XXI
238 Georgia College Loss 8-11 181.82 Mar 19th College Southerns XXI
253 Georgia Southern Loss 10-11 367.01 Mar 19th College Southerns XXI
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)