#57 Stanford (5-14)

avg: 1582.25  •  sd: 56.59  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
9 Oregon Loss 4-15 1537.14 Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
18 California Loss 7-9 1682.23 Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
54 Northwestern Loss 9-13 1197.62 Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
46 Western Washington Win 9-8 1813.53 Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
73 California-Santa Barbara Win 10-5 2065.54 Jan 29th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
109 Southern California Loss 8-9 1198.91 Jan 29th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
6 Colorado Loss 8-14 1661.53 Feb 18th President’s Day Invite
32 Oregon State Loss 8-10 1543.06 Feb 18th President’s Day Invite
58 California-San Diego Loss 8-10 1318.75 Feb 18th President’s Day Invite
29 Utah State Loss 9-12 1492.91 Feb 19th President’s Day Invite
7 Cal Poly-SLO Loss 3-14 1575.35 Feb 19th President’s Day Invite
10 California-Santa Cruz Loss 9-10 1964.74 Feb 19th President’s Day Invite
73 California-Santa Barbara Win 13-9 1910.2 Feb 20th President’s Day Invite
46 Western Washington Loss 9-13 1269.97 Feb 20th President’s Day Invite
16 British Columbia Loss 6-13 1392.55 Mar 4th Stanford Invite Mens
47 Colorado State Loss 8-10 1384.56 Mar 4th Stanford Invite Mens
17 Washington Loss 10-12 1752.02 Mar 4th Stanford Invite Mens
73 California-Santa Barbara Win 9-8 1616.64 Mar 5th Stanford Invite Mens
78 Santa Clara Win 11-9 1724.28 Mar 5th Stanford Invite Mens
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)