#60 Missouri (11-2)

avg: 1394.56  •  sd: 83.17  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
259 Oklahoma State** Win 12-4 1067.69 Ignored Feb 25th Dust Bowl 2023
243 Texas-B** Win 13-5 1129.89 Ignored Feb 25th Dust Bowl 2023
172 Rice Win 12-6 1455 Feb 25th Dust Bowl 2023
103 Iowa Win 10-8 1435.58 Feb 25th Dust Bowl 2023
172 Rice Win 8-3 1475.69 Feb 26th Dust Bowl 2023
32 Oklahoma Christian Loss 7-8 1502.39 Feb 26th Dust Bowl 2023
111 John Brown Win 8-5 1581.94 Feb 26th Dust Bowl 2023
188 Luther Win 13-6 1396.21 Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
328 Grinnell-B** Win 13-0 498.15 Ignored Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
136 Truman State Win 9-6 1438.26 Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
153 Minnesota-Duluth Win 11-7 1413.87 Mar 5th Midwest Throwdown 2023
86 Grinnell Loss 7-8 1139.36 Mar 5th Midwest Throwdown 2023
136 Truman State Win 8-7 1144.69 Mar 5th Midwest Throwdown 2023
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)