#150 George Washington (4-9)

avg: 1148.25  •  sd: 64.33  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
50 Case Western Reserve Loss 12-13 1515.01 Feb 25th Easterns Qualifier 2023
71 Cornell Loss 10-12 1265.47 Feb 25th Easterns Qualifier 2023
26 Georgia Tech** Loss 5-13 1268.33 Ignored Feb 25th Easterns Qualifier 2023
51 Virginia Loss 7-13 1077.93 Feb 25th Easterns Qualifier 2023
59 Cincinnati Loss 12-15 1278.21 Feb 26th Easterns Qualifier 2023
77 Temple Loss 8-14 944.28 Feb 26th Easterns Qualifier 2023
104 Florida State Loss 13-14 1220.01 Feb 26th Easterns Qualifier 2023
248 Drexel Win 11-5 1344.55 Mar 4th Oak Creek Challenge 2023
157 Yale Loss 8-10 862.49 Mar 4th Oak Creek Challenge 2023
67 Virginia Tech Loss 5-13 953.29 Mar 4th Oak Creek Challenge 2023
162 American Win 13-12 1229.41 Mar 5th Oak Creek Challenge 2023
286 Maryland-Baltimore County Win 9-8 670.96 Mar 5th Oak Creek Challenge 2023
185 West Chester Win 13-9 1423.22 Mar 5th Oak Creek Challenge 2023
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)