#92 John Brown (11-7)

avg: 1377.68  •  sd: 68.53  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
194 Kansas State Win 13-8 1503.77 Feb 2nd Big D in Little d Open 2019
67 Oklahoma State Loss 10-11 1408.96 Feb 2nd Big D in Little d Open 2019
179 Nebraska Win 10-9 1183.84 Feb 2nd Big D in Little d Open 2019
394 North Texas-B** Win 13-2 860.18 Ignored Feb 2nd Big D in Little d Open 2019
363 Texas State -B** Win 15-2 1015.34 Ignored Feb 3rd Big D in Little d Open 2019
82 Texas State Win 11-9 1691.86 Feb 3rd Big D in Little d Open 2019
80 Oklahoma Win 12-9 1797.33 Feb 3rd Big D in Little d Open 2019
23 Texas Tech Loss 4-15 1231.13 Feb 3rd Big D in Little d Open 2019
342 Oklahoma-B** Win 15-4 1124.79 Ignored Mar 10th Dust Bowl 2019
229 Missouri Win 15-4 1513.85 Mar 10th Dust Bowl 2019
80 Oklahoma Loss 8-15 887.16 Mar 10th Dust Bowl 2019
144 Colorado College Win 15-10 1645.37 Mar 10th Dust Bowl 2019
38 Purdue Loss 9-11 1457.84 Mar 30th Huck Finn XXIII
57 Carnegie Mellon Loss 1-11 987.38 Mar 30th Huck Finn XXIII
46 Iowa State Loss 4-6 1293.62 Mar 31st Huck Finn XXIII
164 Arizona State Loss 10-11 978.22 Mar 31st Huck Finn XXIII
111 Washington University Win 7-6 1438.46 Mar 31st Huck Finn XXIII
86 Marquette Win 11-8 1791.68 Mar 31st Huck Finn XXIII
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)