#79 Notre Dame (12-8)

avg: 1289.15  •  sd: 61.67  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
116 Tennessee Win 15-8 1642.84 Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
37 William & Mary Loss 9-15 963.64 Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
52 Virginia Loss 11-12 1253 Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
18 Ohio State Loss 7-15 1076.46 Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
60 Appalachian State Loss 10-11 1232.46 Feb 12th Queen City Tune Up1
87 Purdue Win 12-6 1825.77 Feb 12th Queen City Tune Up1
70 Maryland Loss 12-13 1197.05 Feb 25th Easterns Qualifier 2023
115 Florida State Win 13-10 1413.9 Feb 25th Easterns Qualifier 2023
41 Duke Loss 9-13 1040.08 Feb 25th Easterns Qualifier 2023
25 North Carolina-Wilmington Win 12-11 1750.44 Feb 25th Easterns Qualifier 2023
90 Alabama Win 15-11 1604.66 Feb 26th Easterns Qualifier 2023
49 Case Western Reserve Loss 11-15 1028.08 Feb 26th Easterns Qualifier 2023
64 Georgetown Loss 7-11 877.18 Feb 26th Easterns Qualifier 2023
141 LSU Win 10-9 1104.7 Mar 11th Tally Classic XVII
115 Florida State Win 10-6 1581.92 Mar 11th Tally Classic XVII
247 Georgia Southern** Win 13-5 1013.37 Ignored Mar 11th Tally Classic XVII
204 South Florida Win 11-5 1245.4 Mar 11th Tally Classic XVII
107 Chicago Win 13-12 1251.02 Mar 12th Tally Classic XVII
167 Minnesota-Duluth Win 15-14 998.66 Mar 12th Tally Classic XVII
104 Tulane Win 13-10 1469.82 Mar 12th Tally Classic XVII
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)