#268 Ithaca (5-6)

avg: 787.4  •  sd: 107.32  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
193 Colgate Loss 8-9 886.84 Mar 23rd Spring Awakening 8
96 Bowdoin Win 6-5 1492.81 Mar 23rd Spring Awakening 8
223 Rensselaer Polytech Loss 5-10 342.71 Mar 23rd Spring Awakening 8
293 Wentworth Loss 10-11 576.4 Mar 23rd Spring Awakening 8
281 Skidmore Win 12-8 1190.76 Mar 24th Spring Awakening 8
193 Colgate Loss 4-13 411.84 Mar 24th Spring Awakening 8
392 Emerson Win 13-8 767.74 Mar 30th Uprising 8
432 SUNY-Buffalo-B** Win 13-2 503.29 Ignored Mar 30th Uprising 8
281 Skidmore Win 10-7 1139.27 Mar 30th Uprising 8
190 Maine Loss 4-9 425.06 Mar 30th Uprising 8
210 Rochester Loss 11-13 724.45 Mar 31st Uprising 8
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)