#182 Berry (4-8)

avg: 1013.88  •  sd: 91.17  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
234 Xavier Win 13-6 1373.54 Mar 4th FCS D III Tune Up 2023
101 Navy Loss 8-13 880.33 Mar 4th FCS D III Tune Up 2023
171 Brandeis Loss 8-13 570.69 Mar 4th FCS D III Tune Up 2023
99 Oberlin Loss 9-13 979.1 Mar 4th FCS D III Tune Up 2023
164 Butler Win 13-7 1658.41 Mar 5th FCS D III Tune Up 2023
127 Elon Loss 9-11 1013.91 Mar 5th FCS D III Tune Up 2023
60 Middlebury Loss 11-13 1349.19 Mar 5th FCS D III Tune Up 2023
211 Embry-Riddle Loss 11-13 665.59 Mar 25th Needle in a Ho Stack2
133 Davidson Loss 3-13 638.16 Mar 25th Needle in a Ho Stack2
270 Wake Forest Win 12-5 1248.04 Mar 25th Needle in a Ho Stack2
107 Tennessee Loss 8-11 976.11 Mar 25th Needle in a Ho Stack2
317 North Carolina-Asheville Win 15-7 938.85 Mar 26th Needle in a Ho Stack2
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)