#144 Occidental (10-3)

avg: 972.14  •  sd: 92.72  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
113 Cal Poly-SLO-B Win 10-7 1491.32 Feb 4th Stanford Open
105 California-Davis Loss 6-11 592.54 Feb 4th Stanford Open
302 Santa Clara-B** Win 10-4 477.13 Ignored Feb 4th Stanford Open
192 Loyola Marymount Win 12-7 1220.19 Feb 5th Stanford Open
266 Portland Win 10-7 665.12 Feb 5th Stanford Open
105 California-Davis Loss 8-10 876.57 Feb 5th Stanford Open
91 Santa Clara Loss 7-12 697.86 Feb 5th Stanford Open
236 Arizona State-B Win 11-7 925.88 Feb 18th Temecula Throwdown
252 UCLA-B Win 13-6 979.42 Feb 18th Temecula Throwdown
295 California-San Diego-C** Win 15-0 616.17 Ignored Feb 18th Temecula Throwdown
235 Southern California-B Win 11-10 584.33 Feb 18th Temecula Throwdown
218 Cal State-Long Beach Win 15-5 1152.95 Feb 19th Temecula Throwdown
168 California-San Diego-B Win 15-6 1464.23 Feb 19th Temecula Throwdown
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)