#233 Missouri (3-7)

avg: 812.4  •  sd: 93.71  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
420 Wisconsin-C** Win 15-1 427.08 Ignored Mar 3rd Midwest Throwdown 2018
342 Washington University-B Win 15-4 996.36 Mar 3rd Midwest Throwdown 2018
190 Northern Iowa Win 13-7 1533.32 Mar 3rd Midwest Throwdown 2018
74 Washington University** Loss 1-15 818.49 Ignored Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2018
171 Truman State Loss 11-13 809.76 Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2018
142 North Park Loss 5-9 634.7 Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2018
181 Ball State Loss 8-12 569.6 Mar 24th Indy Invite College Men 2018
95 Purdue Loss 4-12 752.93 Mar 24th Indy Invite College Men 2018
137 Grand Valley State Loss 0-7 572.95 Mar 24th Indy Invite College Men 2018
122 Tennessee Loss 3-13 655.55 Mar 24th Indy Invite College Men 2018
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)