#383 Indiana-B (6-11)

avg: 211.77  •  sd: 64.69  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
185 Georgia-B** Loss 2-13 383.95 Ignored Mar 10th Tally Classic XIII
406 South Florida-B Win 13-8 453.68 Mar 10th Tally Classic XIII
292 Central Florida-B Loss 6-13 7.04 Mar 10th Tally Classic XIII
399 Florida Polytechnic University Win 12-7 575.36 Mar 10th Tally Classic XIII
309 Embry-Riddle (Florida) Loss 6-13 -42.6 Mar 10th Tally Classic XIII
370 Notre Dame-B Loss 9-11 48.15 Mar 11th Tally Classic XIII
340 Stetson Win 10-8 673.3 Mar 11th Tally Classic XIII
108 Franciscan** Loss 2-13 701.89 Ignored Mar 24th 2018 B Team Brodown
350 California-Pennsylvania Win 6-5 492.34 Mar 24th 2018 B Team Brodown
220 Dartmouth-B** Loss 2-10 273.7 Ignored Mar 24th 2018 B Team Brodown
402 Cleveland State Win 8-7 158.02 Mar 24th 2018 B Team Brodown
362 Carnegie Mellon University-B Loss 6-7 210.5 Mar 24th 2018 B Team Brodown
279 Penn State-B Loss 2-13 66.31 Mar 25th 2018 B Team Brodown
334 Illinois State-B Loss 9-10 305.32 Mar 31st Illinois Invite 2018
422 Illinois-C Win 9-4 402.48 Mar 31st Illinois Invite 2018
337 DePaul Loss 4-9 -187.01 Mar 31st Illinois Invite 2018
- Beloit College Loss 4-13 -91.04 Mar 31st Illinois Invite 2018
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)