#15 North Carolina State (13-7)

avg: 1805.28  •  sd: 50.98  •  top 16/20: 89.6%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
142 Carleton College-CHOP** Win 15-5 1593.41 Ignored Jan 28th Carolina Kickoff
75 Richmond Win 15-9 1827.49 Jan 28th Carolina Kickoff
24 North Carolina-Charlotte Win 14-10 2099.12 Jan 28th Carolina Kickoff
17 South Carolina Win 15-11 2155.04 Jan 28th Carolina Kickoff
55 Georgetown Win 15-12 1711.64 Jan 29th Carolina Kickoff
2 North Carolina Loss 8-15 1573.58 Jan 29th Carolina Kickoff
24 North Carolina-Charlotte Win 15-10 2154.02 Jan 29th Carolina Kickoff
95 Chicago Win 15-5 1814.71 Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
42 Penn State Win 15-5 2125.71 Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
25 North Carolina-Wilmington Win 11-9 1943.34 Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
35 Washington University Win 12-11 1734.29 Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
13 Tufts Loss 10-11 1733.18 Feb 12th Queen City Tune Up1
19 Ohio State Win 13-8 2242.03 Feb 12th Queen City Tune Up1
1 Massachusetts Loss 6-13 1620.24 Mar 4th Smoky Mountain Invite
108 Tennessee Win 13-7 1703.35 Mar 4th Smoky Mountain Invite
4 Texas Loss 8-11 1655.9 Mar 4th Smoky Mountain Invite
14 UCLA Loss 10-11 1705.83 Mar 4th Smoky Mountain Invite
58 Auburn Win 12-9 1745.41 Mar 5th Smoky Mountain Invite
10 Minnesota Loss 12-14 1667.61 Mar 5th Smoky Mountain Invite
27 Northeastern Loss 12-15 1381.96 Mar 5th Smoky Mountain Invite
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)