#83 Delaware (5-5)

avg: 1272.96  •  sd: 72.44  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
151 Johns Hopkins Win 14-9 1431.46 Feb 18th Blue Hen Open
68 Lehigh Loss 13-14 1242.26 Feb 18th Blue Hen Open
74 Binghamton Loss 11-12 1193.61 Feb 18th Blue Hen Open
158 NYU Win 11-10 1056.35 Feb 19th Blue Hen Open
74 Binghamton Loss 9-12 973.25 Feb 19th Blue Hen Open
127 Connecticut Win 10-5 1620.24 Mar 4th Fish Bowl
51 James Madison Loss 9-11 1188 Mar 4th Fish Bowl
46 Rutgers Win 11-9 1710.67 Mar 4th Fish Bowl
122 Carnegie Mellon Win 10-9 1207.27 Mar 5th Fish Bowl
25 North Carolina-Wilmington Loss 6-15 1094.13 Mar 5th Fish Bowl
**Blowout Eligible


The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)