#215 North Park (9-3)

avg: 881.54  •  sd: 78.2  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
301 Purdue-B Win 13-6 1044.41 Mar 25th Midwest Invite Plan B
164 Butler Loss 4-13 500.88 Mar 25th Midwest Invite Plan B
354 Butler-B** Win 13-1 552.83 Ignored Mar 25th Midwest Invite Plan B
234 Xavier Win 9-8 898.54 Mar 25th Midwest Invite Plan B
306 Rose-Hulman Win 13-8 914.4 Mar 26th Midwest Invite Plan B
191 Grace Loss 11-12 856.11 Mar 26th Midwest Invite Plan B
- Bradley Win 8-1 895.38 Apr 1st Illinois Invite1
236 Eastern Michigan Loss 2-4 270.9 Apr 1st Illinois Invite1
346 Notre Dame-B** Win 8-1 692.32 Ignored Apr 1st Illinois Invite1
310 Knox Win 13-8 876.61 Apr 2nd Illinois Invite1
255 Toledo Win 12-8 1156.76 Apr 2nd Illinois Invite1
272 Ohio Win 7-2 1219.98 Apr 2nd Illinois Invite1
**Blowout Eligible


The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)