#30 Utah State (10-10)

avg: 1650.7  •  sd: 45.33  •  top 16/20: 3.1%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
124 Arizona State Win 13-6 1664.85 Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
64 California-San Diego Win 13-6 1979.59 Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
9 California-Santa Cruz Loss 11-13 1666.62 Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
20 Washington Win 14-12 1963.01 Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
57 Utah Win 5-3 1825.02 Jan 29th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
62 Northwestern Win 13-12 1512.69 Jan 29th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
33 Victoria Loss 11-12 1501.01 Jan 29th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
14 UCLA Loss 10-12 1592.7 Feb 18th President’s Day Invite
26 California Loss 9-12 1347.75 Feb 18th President’s Day Invite
45 Western Washington Win 11-8 1854.86 Feb 18th President’s Day Invite
66 Stanford Win 12-9 1717.86 Feb 19th President’s Day Invite
8 Cal Poly-SLO Loss 9-10 1807.95 Feb 19th President’s Day Invite
9 California-Santa Cruz Loss 8-12 1454.31 Feb 19th President’s Day Invite
52 Colorado State Win 10-8 1699.13 Feb 20th President’s Day Invite
26 California Loss 10-13 1364.97 Feb 20th President’s Day Invite
7 Oregon Loss 8-13 1471.92 Mar 4th Stanford Invite Mens
33 Victoria Win 13-10 1954.16 Mar 4th Stanford Invite Mens
81 Santa Clara Win 13-4 1875.93 Mar 4th Stanford Invite Mens
16 British Columbia Loss 11-12 1652.02 Mar 5th Stanford Invite Mens
64 California-San Diego Loss 10-11 1254.59 Mar 5th Stanford Invite Mens
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)