#189 North Texas (6-8)

avg: 727.59  •  sd: 83.64  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
217 Baylor Win 9-5 1088.72 Feb 25th Dust Bowl 2023
100 Arkansas Loss 8-9 1048.48 Feb 25th Dust Bowl 2023
162 Wichita State Loss 8-9 774.42 Feb 25th Dust Bowl 2023
255 Harding Win 9-6 785.69 Feb 25th Dust Bowl 2023
160 Kansas Loss 5-11 304 Feb 26th Dust Bowl 2023
198 Illinois State Win 9-6 1095.52 Feb 26th Dust Bowl 2023
111 Iowa Loss 7-9 830.3 Feb 26th Dust Bowl 2023
111 Iowa Loss 5-12 509.63 Mar 11th Centex Tier 2
249 Oklahoma State Loss 8-10 136.72 Mar 11th Centex Tier 2
297 Trinity** Win 13-0 577.76 Ignored Mar 11th Centex Tier 2
234 Texas-B Win 12-11 586.31 Mar 12th Centex Tier 2
161 Colorado-B Loss 3-7 303.62 Mar 12th Centex Tier 2
38 Iowa State Loss 8-15 903.17 Mar 12th Centex Tier 2
210 Texas-Dallas Win 15-9 1124.25 Mar 12th Centex Tier 2
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)