#286 Wisconsin-B (4-8)

avg: 294.74  •  sd: 67.24  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
311 Knox Win 10-7 495.73 Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
41 Iowa State** Loss 1-13 929.03 Ignored Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
214 Wisconsin-Eau Claire Loss 7-12 144.82 Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
322 Iowa State-B Win 8-7 138.16 Mar 5th Midwest Throwdown 2023
250 DePaul Loss 6-7 374.38 Mar 5th Midwest Throwdown 2023
248 Northern Iowa Loss 12-13 383.6 Mar 5th Midwest Throwdown 2023
196 Macalester Loss 5-8 302.18 Mar 25th Old Capitol Open
270 Loyola-Chicago Loss 6-7 289.87 Mar 25th Old Capitol Open
323 St John's (Minnesota) Win 9-7 269.77 Mar 25th Old Capitol Open
280 Ball State Loss 6-7 214.11 Mar 26th Old Capitol Open
323 St John's (Minnesota) Win 8-2 590.43 Mar 26th Old Capitol Open
297 Wisconsin-Stevens Point Loss 6-7 65.72 Mar 26th Old Capitol Open
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)