#103 Delaware (8-6)

avg: 1324.18  •  sd: 60.64  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
106 RIT Loss 10-13 987.61 Feb 24th Oak Creek Challenge 2018
173 Oberlin Win 13-9 1452.31 Feb 24th Oak Creek Challenge 2018
136 Ohio Win 12-11 1299.77 Feb 24th Oak Creek Challenge 2018
115 Villanova Loss 9-12 931.31 Feb 24th Oak Creek Challenge 2018
107 Rutgers Loss 11-15 933.2 Feb 25th Oak Creek Challenge 2018
109 Williams Win 15-13 1510.39 Feb 25th Oak Creek Challenge 2018
182 NYU Win 15-3 1598.75 Feb 25th Oak Creek Challenge 2018
209 SUNY-Buffalo Win 13-9 1338.99 Mar 17th Oak Creek Invite 2018
33 Maryland Loss 10-13 1356.14 Mar 17th Oak Creek Invite 2018
54 Mary Washington Loss 9-11 1275.02 Mar 17th Oak Creek Invite 2018
179 SUNY-Binghamton Win 13-7 1575.61 Mar 17th Oak Creek Invite 2018
169 Johns Hopkins Win 15-10 1514.28 Mar 18th Oak Creek Invite 2018
115 Villanova Loss 13-14 1151.67 Mar 18th Oak Creek Invite 2018
109 Williams Win 13-11 1525.05 Mar 18th Oak Creek Invite 2018
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)