#409 Texas-Dallas-B (0-13)

avg: 163.11  •  sd: 86.75  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
144 Colorado College** Loss 1-13 591.77 Ignored Feb 2nd Big D in Little d Open 2019
342 Oklahoma-B Loss 5-12 -75.21 Feb 2nd Big D in Little d Open 2019
277 Texas-San Antonio Loss 7-11 302.6 Feb 2nd Big D in Little d Open 2019
82 Texas State** Loss 3-13 842.65 Ignored Feb 2nd Big D in Little d Open 2019
381 Southern Methodist Loss 7-11 -140.24 Feb 3rd Big D in Little d Open 2019
324 Stephen F. Austin Loss 5-15 -15 Feb 3rd Big D in Little d Open 2019
394 North Texas-B Loss 8-9 135.18 Feb 3rd Big D in Little d Open 2019
324 Stephen F. Austin Loss 8-12 143.85 Mar 16th Centex 2019 Men
273 Colorado State-B Loss 6-10 279.58 Mar 16th Centex 2019 Men
205 Wisconsin-B Loss 7-9 691.25 Mar 16th Centex 2019 Men
324 Stephen F. Austin Loss 8-11 219.39 Mar 17th Centex 2019 Men
363 Texas State -B Loss 12-13 290.34 Mar 17th Centex 2019 Men
367 Texas-B Loss 8-15 -173.57 Mar 17th Centex 2019 Men
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)