#33 Victoria (6-9)

avg: 1626.01  •  sd: 82.51  •  top 16/20: 7%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
3 Brigham Young Loss 9-14 1643.65 Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
47 Case Western Reserve Loss 11-12 1330.38 Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
14 UCLA Loss 10-11 1705.83 Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
110 Southern California Win 12-8 1572.71 Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
16 British Columbia Win 10-7 2166.68 Jan 29th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
7 Oregon Loss 6-10 1471.92 Jan 29th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
30 Utah State Win 12-11 1775.7 Jan 29th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
26 California Loss 4-11 1093.11 Jan 29th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
7 Oregon Loss 9-13 1549.51 Mar 4th Stanford Invite Mens
30 Utah State Loss 10-13 1322.55 Mar 4th Stanford Invite Mens
81 Santa Clara Win 13-5 1875.93 Mar 4th Stanford Invite Mens
31 Oregon State Loss 11-12 1506.02 Mar 5th Stanford Invite Mens
26 California Win 12-7 2213.62 Mar 5th Stanford Invite Mens
29 Wisconsin Win 12-10 1904.79 Mar 5th Stanford Invite Mens
20 Washington Loss 6-12 1162.74 Mar 5th Stanford Invite Mens
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)