#98 Arizona State (5-2)

avg: 1116.73  •  sd: 156.36  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
253 Cal Poly-SLO-C** Win 13-4 709.81 Ignored Feb 1st 2020 Mens Presidents Day Qualifier
203 Caltech Win 12-5 1149.67 Feb 1st 2020 Mens Presidents Day Qualifier
243 Fresno State** Win 12-3 806.74 Ignored Feb 1st 2020 Mens Presidents Day Qualifier
162 Cal Poly-Pomona Loss 5-8 322.53 Feb 1st 2020 Mens Presidents Day Qualifier
41 Santa Clara Loss 6-10 1058.32 Feb 2nd 2020 Mens Presidents Day Qualifier
146 Colorado-B Win 9-5 1416.3 Feb 2nd 2020 Mens Presidents Day Qualifier
105 Cal State-Long Beach Win 10-6 1576.34 Feb 2nd 2020 Mens Presidents Day Qualifier
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)