#300 Rutgers-B (4-5)

avg: 445.57  •  sd: 60.17  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
340 Lehigh-B Win 9-6 590.21 Feb 25th Bring The Huckus1
359 Pennsylvania-B Win 13-2 466.65 Feb 25th Bring The Huckus1
220 Dickinson Loss 7-12 337.12 Feb 25th Bring The Huckus1
330 Edinboro Win 8-5 722.97 Feb 25th Bring The Huckus1
239 Stevens Tech Loss 7-10 372.09 Feb 26th Bring The Huckus1
144 Army** Loss 3-11 575.5 Ignored Mar 26th Garden State1
263 Swarthmore Loss 5-9 152.23 Mar 26th Garden State1
119 College of New Jersey** Loss 2-11 697.25 Ignored Mar 26th Garden State1
352 Siena Win 9-5 553.03 Mar 26th Garden State1
**Blowout Eligible


The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)