#157 Knox (6-4)

avg: 551.18  •  sd: 102.33  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
104 Iowa Loss 3-14 366.86 Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
66 Kansas** Loss 1-13 668.16 Ignored Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
180 Wisconsin-La Crosse Win 11-5 934.74 Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
152 Grinnell Win 5-4 720.43 Mar 5th Midwest Throwdown 2023
155 Luther Win 5-5 555.95 Mar 5th Midwest Throwdown 2023
- North Park** Win 15-3 257.5 Ignored Apr 1st Illinois Invite1
214 Notre Dame-B** Win 13-3 395.29 Ignored Apr 1st Illinois Invite1
174 Wheaton (Illinois) Win 10-4 994.94 Apr 1st Illinois Invite1
123 Denver Loss 6-9 402.46 Apr 2nd Illinois Invite1
174 Wheaton (Illinois) Loss 3-6 -151.75 Apr 2nd Illinois Invite1
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)