#5 Vermont (9-2)

avg: 2373.3  •  sd: 85.45  •  top 16/20: 100%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
69 Case Western Reserve** Win 15-2 1850.46 Ignored Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
47 Florida** Win 15-6 2067.9 Ignored Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
21 North Carolina State** Win 15-6 2356.31 Ignored Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
13 Pittsburgh Win 12-5 2533.35 Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
7 Carleton College Win 9-8 2403.35 Feb 12th Queen City Tune Up1
1 North Carolina Loss 7-11 2471.02 Feb 12th Queen City Tune Up1
11 Oregon Win 13-5 2696.82 Mar 25th Northwest Challenge1
20 Western Washington Win 13-9 2199 Mar 25th Northwest Challenge1
8 Stanford Loss 8-12 1792.17 Mar 26th Northwest Challenge1
20 Western Washington Win 13-2 2380.43 Mar 26th Northwest Challenge1
9 Washington Win 13-9 2602.09 Mar 26th Northwest Challenge1
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)