#86 Boston College (8-3)

avg: 955.65  •  sd: 79.65  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
160 Swarthmore Win 11-3 970.68 Feb 25th Bring The Huckus1
119 New Hampshire Win 13-3 1312.53 Feb 25th Bring The Huckus1
147 Connecticut College Win 13-5 1128 Feb 25th Bring The Huckus1
117 SUNY-Geneseo Win 8-4 1289.11 Feb 26th Bring The Huckus1
101 Ithaca Win 7-6 984.56 Feb 26th Bring The Huckus1
53 Haverford/Bryn Mawr Loss 4-13 669.76 Feb 26th Bring The Huckus1
79 St. Olaf Loss 6-8 706.98 Mar 25th Needle in a Ho Stack2
181 Richmond** Win 11-3 774.71 Ignored Mar 25th Needle in a Ho Stack2
195 Wake Forest** Win 13-1 599.9 Ignored Mar 25th Needle in a Ho Stack2
61 Tennessee Loss 3-13 556.5 Mar 25th Needle in a Ho Stack2
115 Union (Tennessee) Win 10-7 1145.08 Mar 26th Needle in a Ho Stack2
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)