#199 College of New Jersey (2-7)

avg: 87.34  •  sd: 133.92  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
143 Connecticut Win 7-6 792.98 Mar 4th Philly Special1
169 Colby Win 7-6 557.59 Mar 5th Philly Special1
187 Dickinson Loss 5-7 -76.24 Mar 5th Philly Special1
128 West Chester** Loss 1-10 192.71 Ignored Mar 5th Philly Special1
120 Brandeis** Loss 1-8 241.34 Ignored Mar 5th Philly Special1
185 Messiah Loss 4-13 -336.52 Mar 25th Garden State1
61 Vermont-B** Loss 3-8 686.54 Ignored Mar 25th Garden State1
- SUNY-Albany Loss 5-6 -277.66 Mar 26th Garden State1
140 Rochester Loss 0-13 80.32 Mar 26th Garden State1
**Blowout Eligible


The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)