#121 Saint Louis (6-5)

avg: 698.72  •  sd: 61.41  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
187 Wisconsin-B Win 11-0 723.84 Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
151 Washington University-B Win 6-4 866.25 Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
47 Washington University** Loss 1-11 755.16 Ignored Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
114 Marquette Win 6-5 914.67 Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
68 Northwestern Loss 3-11 515.06 Mar 5th Midwest Throwdown 2023
163 Truman State Win 8-2 950.79 Mar 5th Midwest Throwdown 2023
177 Wisconsin-La Crosse Win 10-3 819.32 Mar 25th Old Capitol Open
153 Loyola-Chicago Loss 5-6 357.77 Mar 25th Old Capitol Open
69 Iowa State Loss 4-9 513.16 Mar 25th Old Capitol Open
102 Iowa Loss 4-5 734.51 Mar 25th Old Capitol Open
209 Minnesota-B** Win 8-3 361.63 Ignored Mar 26th Old Capitol Open
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)