#62 Winona State (15-2)

avg: 1154.58  •  sd: 79.22  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
99 Colorado College Win 7-1 1519.39 Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
126 John Brown Win 12-1 1275.67 Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
155 Luther** Win 13-3 1046.93 Ignored Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
- Wisconsin-Eau Claire** Win 8-1 914.06 Ignored Mar 4th Midwest Throwdown 2023
52 Arkansas Loss 2-6 696.29 Mar 5th Midwest Throwdown 2023
69 Iowa State Win 8-3 1713.16 Mar 5th Midwest Throwdown 2023
145 Macalester** Win 13-3 1149 Ignored Mar 5th Midwest Throwdown 2023
153 Loyola-Chicago Win 8-4 1047.58 Mar 19th Meltdown College
103 Michigan Tech Win 8-7 980.61 Mar 19th Meltdown College
- Missouri Win 7-4 1266.74 Mar 19th Meltdown College
- Wheaton (Illinois)** Win 5-1 961.93 Ignored Mar 19th Meltdown College
102 Iowa Win 6-4 1225.12 Mar 25th Old Capitol Open
137 Michigan State Win 10-1 1196.47 Mar 25th Old Capitol Open
209 Minnesota-B** Win 12-0 361.63 Ignored Mar 25th Old Capitol Open
69 Iowa State Loss 3-6 566.46 Mar 26th Old Capitol Open
145 Macalester** Win 8-3 1149 Ignored Mar 26th Old Capitol Open
137 Michigan State Win 9-4 1196.47 Mar 26th Old Capitol Open
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)