#68 William & Mary (6-7)

avg: 1137.58  •  sd: 110.17  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
78 American Loss 6-9 655.92 Jan 28th Winta Binta Vinta
135 Liberty Win 11-4 1188.27 Jan 28th Winta Binta Vinta
29 Ohio State Loss 4-10 911.24 Jan 28th Winta Binta Vinta
140 Virginia-B Win 8-4 1102.9 Jan 28th Winta Binta Vinta
48 James Madison Win 10-9 1488.02 Jan 29th Winta Binta Vinta
29 Ohio State Loss 0-9 911.24 Jan 29th Winta Binta Vinta
65 Virginia Tech Win 9-5 1688.24 Jan 29th Winta Binta Vinta
54 Florida State Win 9-8 1454.11 Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
1 North Carolina** Loss 0-15 2159.64 Ignored Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
25 Notre Dame Loss 6-13 953.33 Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
28 Minnesota Loss 8-11 1149.7 Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up1
69 Case Western Reserve Win 9-8 1246.58 Feb 12th Queen City Tune Up1
40 Georgia Loss 4-9 827.61 Feb 12th Queen City Tune Up1
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)