#200 Nevada-Reno (4-8)

avg: 883.18  •  sd: 68.16  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
87 California-Santa Cruz** Loss 2-11 987.75 Ignored Feb 18th Santa Clara Tournament 2018
265 Cal Poly-SLO-B** Win 11-4 620.41 Ignored Feb 18th Santa Clara Tournament 2018
242 California-Davis-B Win 11-2 1110.9 Feb 18th Santa Clara Tournament 2018
176 Occidental Loss 4-9 410.03 Feb 19th Santa Clara Tournament 2018
265 Cal Poly-SLO-B** Win 10-3 620.41 Ignored Feb 19th Santa Clara Tournament 2018
249 California-B Win 12-1 1024.8 Feb 19th Santa Clara Tournament 2018
98 Northern Arizona** Loss 3-10 923.85 Ignored Mar 24th Trouble in Vegas 2018
105 Chico State Loss 4-6 1113.73 Mar 24th Trouble in Vegas 2018
73 San Diego State** Loss 1-10 1123.73 Ignored Mar 24th Trouble in Vegas 2018
63 Arizona** Loss 1-13 1186.23 Ignored Mar 24th Trouble in Vegas 2018
120 California-San Diego-B Loss 3-7 778.7 Mar 25th Trouble in Vegas 2018
197 Arizona-B Loss 3-4 789.92 Mar 25th Trouble in Vegas 2018
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)