#114 Union (Tennessee) (8-9)

avg: 899.39  •  sd: 119.05  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
136 Alabama Loss 8-9 597.36 Jan 28th T Town Throwdown1
220 Emory-B** Win 12-0 -94.27 Ignored Jan 28th T Town Throwdown1
167 Jacksonville State Win 7-0 1049.33 Jan 28th T Town Throwdown1
100 Alabama-Huntsville Loss 10-11 857.72 Jan 29th T Town Throwdown1
220 Emory-B** Win 13-0 -94.27 Ignored Jan 29th T Town Throwdown1
167 Jacksonville State Win 9-2 1049.33 Jan 29th T Town Throwdown1
54 Georgia Tech Win 7-2 1952.86 Feb 11th 2023 TOTS The Only Tenn I See
195 Georgia Tech-B** Win 10-0 756.73 Ignored Feb 11th 2023 TOTS The Only Tenn I See
88 Kentucky Loss 4-7 584.57 Feb 11th 2023 TOTS The Only Tenn I See
56 Tennessee Loss 3-9 740.42 Feb 11th 2023 TOTS The Only Tenn I See
136 Alabama Loss 4-7 226.2 Feb 12th 2023 TOTS The Only Tenn I See
88 Kentucky Loss 6-8 780.24 Feb 12th 2023 TOTS The Only Tenn I See
73 St. Olaf Loss 5-6 1101.89 Mar 25th Needle in a Ho Stack2
186 Richmond** Win 13-1 861.23 Ignored Mar 25th Needle in a Ho Stack2
201 Wake Forest** Win 13-1 662.67 Ignored Mar 25th Needle in a Ho Stack2
56 Tennessee Loss 8-9 1215.42 Mar 25th Needle in a Ho Stack2
94 Boston College Loss 7-10 648.83 Mar 26th Needle in a Ho Stack2
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)