#199 Miami (4-9)

avg: 553.62  •  sd: 81.69  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
155 Appalachian State Loss 6-12 270.76 Feb 2nd Hucking Shucking 2019
117 Catholic Loss 4-10 443.8 Feb 2nd Hucking Shucking 2019
209 North Carolina-B Win 13-3 1086.44 Feb 2nd Hucking Shucking 2019
155 Appalachian State Loss 8-10 587.4 Feb 3rd Hucking Shucking 2019
288 University of North Carolina - Asheville Win 13-0 600 Ignored Feb 3rd Hucking Shucking 2019
192 William & Mary-B Win 13-4 1177.01 Feb 3rd Hucking Shucking 2019
147 George Washington Loss 7-10 491.43 Feb 3rd Hucking Shucking 2019
113 Oklahoma Loss 4-11 452.65 Mar 23rd Womens College Centex 2019
101 Trinity Loss 2-11 525.74 Mar 23rd Womens College Centex 2019
206 Texas-San Antonio Loss 6-9 83.83 Mar 23rd Womens College Centex 2019
191 Texas Christian Loss 8-9 453.39 Mar 24th Womens College Centex 2019
141 Iowa Loss 8-13 410.15 Mar 24th Womens College Centex 2019
237 North Texas Win 10-2 859.68 Mar 24th Womens College Centex 2019
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)