#232 Northeastern-B (10-4)

avg: 631.32  •  sd: 68.04  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
261 Maryland-B Win 5-2 738.09 Mar 3rd Cherry B lossom Classic 2018
257 Towson-B Win 7-2 896.68 Mar 3rd Cherry B lossom Classic 2018
233 Brown University-B Win 5-4 739.99 Mar 3rd Cherry B lossom Classic 2018
270 American-B** Win 12-0 300.68 Ignored Mar 4th Cherry B lossom Classic 2018
264 George Washington-B Win 7-2 644.08 Mar 4th Cherry B lossom Classic 2018
266 Wellesley-B** Win 6-2 614.24 Ignored Mar 24th Jersey Devil 7
227 Rowan Win 4-3 808.87 Mar 24th Jersey Devil 7
181 Pittsburgh-B Loss 2-6 394.41 Mar 24th Jersey Devil 7
241 Haverford-B Win 5-4 648.28 Mar 25th Jersey Devil 7
51 Towson** Loss 1-12 1314.84 Ignored Mar 25th Jersey Devil 7
195 Messiah Loss 3-4 802.06 Mar 25th Jersey Devil 7
244 College of New Jersey Win 4-3 629.24 Mar 25th Jersey Devil 7
- Princeton-B** Win 13-1 600 Ignored Mar 31st Garden State 8
199 Salisbury Loss 5-12 286.81 Mar 31st Garden State 8
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)