#70 American (9-4)

avg: 1106.29  •  sd: 84.65  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
130 Liberty Win 11-7 1097.09 Jan 28th Winta Binta Vinta
60 William & Mary Win 9-6 1578.15 Jan 28th Winta Binta Vinta
144 Virginia-B Win 9-8 675.08 Jan 28th Winta Binta Vinta
32 Ohio State Loss 1-10 915.44 Jan 28th Winta Binta Vinta
58 Virginia Tech Loss 5-10 641.67 Jan 29th Winta Binta Vinta
51 Georgetown Win 10-7 1692.97 Jan 29th Winta Binta Vinta
42 James Madison Loss 6-8 1105.59 Jan 29th Winta Binta Vinta
165 George Washington** Win 8-3 930.73 Ignored Feb 4th Cherry Blossom Classic 2023
127 Johns Hopkins Win 7-2 1272.77 Feb 4th Cherry Blossom Classic 2023
100 Delaware Loss 6-7 739.56 Feb 4th Cherry Blossom Classic 2023
139 Towson Win 10-5 1167.79 Feb 4th Cherry Blossom Classic 2023
139 Towson Win 12-5 1193.89 Mar 5th Cherry Blossom Classic 2023
100 Delaware Win 9-7 1143.9 Mar 5th Cherry Blossom Classic 2023
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)