#6 Brigham Young (10-3)

avg: 2281.72  •  sd: 100.28  •  top 16/20: 100%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
12 California-Santa Barbara Win 13-9 2476.99 Jan 27th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
53 Cal Poly-SLO** Win 15-6 1980.02 Ignored Jan 27th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
8 Stanford Win 10-7 2622.99 Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
78 Lewis & Clark** Win 15-1 1778.49 Ignored Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
15 Victoria Win 12-7 2373.16 Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invitational 2023
8 Stanford Loss 9-11 1984.12 Mar 11th Stanford Invite Womens
20 Western Washington Win 13-4 2380.43 Mar 11th Stanford Invite Womens
31 California Win 11-5 2257.96 Mar 11th Stanford Invite Womens
1 North Carolina** Loss 4-11 2337.91 Mar 11th Stanford Invite Womens
15 Victoria Win 9-7 2131.98 Mar 24th Northwest Challenge1
9 Washington Win 13-10 2511.67 Mar 24th Northwest Challenge1
48 Texas Win 13-7 2017.48 Mar 25th Northwest Challenge1
2 British Columbia Loss 10-13 2220.16 Mar 25th Northwest Challenge1
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)