#135 Liberty (3-8)

avg: 588.27  •  sd: 65.67  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
78 American Loss 7-11 607.6 Jan 28th Winta Binta Vinta
29 Ohio State** Loss 2-9 911.24 Ignored Jan 28th Winta Binta Vinta
68 William & Mary Loss 4-11 537.58 Jan 28th Winta Binta Vinta
140 Virginia-B Win 11-4 1138.09 Jan 28th Winta Binta Vinta
62 Georgetown** Loss 3-9 603.8 Ignored Jan 29th Winta Binta Vinta
140 Virginia-B Win 9-8 663.09 Jan 29th Winta Binta Vinta
48 James Madison** Loss 5-13 763.02 Ignored Feb 18th Commonwealth Cup Weekend1 2023
65 Virginia Tech Loss 6-11 612.49 Feb 18th Commonwealth Cup Weekend1 2023
100 Cedarville Loss 6-12 328 Feb 19th Commonwealth Cup Weekend1 2023
120 Mary Washington Loss 6-10 270.12 Feb 19th Commonwealth Cup Weekend1 2023
140 Virginia-B Win 7-6 663.09 Feb 19th Commonwealth Cup Weekend1 2023
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)