#19 Yale (9-2)

avg: 1786.06  •  sd: 110.71  •  top 16/20: 55.7%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
40 Georgia Win 13-7 2088.23 Feb 25th Commonwealth Cup Weekend2 2023
36 Brown Loss 4-13 980.07 Feb 25th Commonwealth Cup Weekend2 2023
35 Michigan Win 12-8 2060.73 Feb 25th Commonwealth Cup Weekend2 2023
13 Pittsburgh Win 11-10 2058.35 Feb 25th Commonwealth Cup Weekend2 2023
71 Massachusetts Win 13-6 1833.48 Feb 26th Commonwealth Cup Weekend2 2023
10 Northeastern Loss 10-12 1896.21 Feb 26th Commonwealth Cup Weekend2 2023
59 Penn State Win 13-5 1901.24 Feb 26th Commonwealth Cup Weekend2 2023
44 Pennsylvania Win 13-6 2084.31 Feb 26th Commonwealth Cup Weekend2 2023
85 Catholic Win 7-6 1229.85 Apr 2nd Kernel Kup
129 Maryland** Win 8-2 1376.19 Ignored Apr 2nd Kernel Kup
160 Towson** Win 10-4 1109.42 Ignored Apr 2nd Kernel Kup
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)