(23) #214 Montana State (4-7)

839.37 (112)

Click on column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Effect % of Ranking Status Date Event
266 Brigham Young-B Win 13-3 32.38 8.95% Mar 2nd Big Sky Brawl 2019
211 Denver Win 10-7 36.88 8.46% Mar 2nd Big Sky Brawl 2019
259 Idaho Loss 8-9 -32.08 8.46% Mar 2nd Big Sky Brawl 2019
196 Northern Arizona Loss 4-8 -36.85 7.11% Mar 2nd Big Sky Brawl 2019
209 Montana Win 10-7 37.53 8.46% Mar 3rd Big Sky Brawl 2019
76 Utah Loss 10-11 49.56 8.95% Mar 3rd Big Sky Brawl 2019
261 Boise State Loss 8-9 -32.9 8.46% Mar 3rd Big Sky Brawl 2019
187 Chico State Loss 7-10 -28.41 10.22% Mar 23rd Trouble in Vegas 2019
288 California-Irvine Win 13-4 24.21 10.81% Mar 23rd Trouble in Vegas 2019
196 Northern Arizona Loss 5-10 -52.11 9.6% Mar 23rd Trouble in Vegas 2019
147 Utah State Loss 8-10 2.24 10.52% Mar 23rd Trouble in Vegas 2019
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The results on this page ("USAU") are the results of an implementation of the USA Ultimate Top 20 algorithm, which is used to allocate post season bids to both colleg and club ultimate teams. The data was obtained by scraping USAU's score reporting website. Learn more about the algorithm here. TL;DR, here is the rating function. Every game a team plays gets a rating equal to the opponents rating +/- the score value. With all these data points, we iterate team ratings until convergence. There is also a rule for discounting blowout games (see next FAQ)
For reference, here is handy table with frequent game scrores and the resulting game value:
"...if a team is rated more than 600 points higher than its opponent, and wins with a score that is more than twice the losing score plus one, the game is ignored for ratings purposes. However, this is only done if the winning team has at least N other results that are not being ignored, where N=5."

Translation: if a team plays a game where even earning the max point win would hurt them, they can have the game ignored provided they win by enough and have suffficient unignored results.