907.62 (162)
# | Opponent | Result | Effect | Opp. Delta | % of Ranking | Status | Date | Event |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
198 | North Texas | Win 7-4 | -21.94 | 161 | 6.35% | Counts (Why) | Feb 4th | Antifreeze |
23 | Texas-Dallas** | Loss 3-13 | 0 | 139 | 0% | Ignored (Why) | Feb 4th | Antifreeze |
109 | Texas State | Loss 5-11 | -46.54 | 162 | 7.66% | Counts (Why) | Feb 4th | Antifreeze |
218 | Texas-B** | Win 13-1 | 0 | 160 | 0% | Ignored (Why) | Feb 4th | Antifreeze |
121 | Texas A&M | Win 12-11 | 4.35 | 154 | 8.35% | Counts | Feb 5th | Antifreeze |
23 | Texas-Dallas** | Loss 3-11 | 0 | 139 | 0% | Ignored (Why) | Feb 5th | Antifreeze |
83 | Trinity | Win 8-7 | 26.81 | 152 | 7.42% | Counts | Feb 5th | Antifreeze |
171 | Illinois | Win 13-6 | 13.57 | 213 | 11.81% | Counts (Why) | Mar 18th | Womens Centex1 |
190 | Colorado-B** | Win 13-1 | 0 | 161 | 0% | Ignored (Why) | Mar 18th | Womens Centex1 |
179 | LSU | Win 13-6 | 5.35 | 160 | 11.81% | Counts (Why) | Mar 18th | Womens Centex1 |
109 | Texas State | Win 13-6 | 85.59 | 162 | 11.81% | Counts (Why) | Mar 18th | Womens Centex1 |
87 | Southern California | Loss 8-12 | -35.17 | 142 | 11.81% | Counts | Mar 19th | Womens Centex1 |
82 | Central Florida | Loss 7-10 | -21.02 | 148 | 11.17% | Counts | Mar 19th | Womens Centex1 |
104 | Iowa | Loss 9-10 | -8.8 | 160 | 11.81% | Counts | Mar 19th | Womens Centex1 |