() #270 Gonzaga (0-10)

-176 (261)

Click on column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Effect % of Ranking Status Date Event
55 Portland** Loss 2-13 0 0% Ignored Feb 23rd 2019 PLU Womens BBQ
205 Portland State** Loss 0-10 31 28.19% Feb 23rd 2019 PLU Womens BBQ
54 Puget Sound** Loss 2-13 0 0% Ignored Feb 23rd 2019 PLU Womens BBQ
251 Washington-B Loss 2-14 -133.27 32.27% Feb 24th 2019 PLU Womens BBQ
188 Idaho** Loss 4-11 112.46 39.53% Mar 30th 2019 NW Challenge Tier 2 3
77 Cal State-Long Beach** Loss 1-11 0 0% Ignored Mar 30th 2019 NW Challenge Tier 2 3
129 Pacific Lutheran** Loss 4-11 0 0% Ignored Mar 30th 2019 NW Challenge Tier 2 3
54 Puget Sound** Loss 0-11 0 0% Ignored Mar 30th 2019 NW Challenge Tier 2 3
84 Victoria** Loss 0-11 0 0% Ignored Mar 30th 2019 NW Challenge Tier 2 3
158 Claremont** Loss 0-13 0 0% Ignored Mar 31st 2019 NW Challenge Tier 2 3
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The results on this page ("USAU") are the results of an implementation of the USA Ultimate Top 20 algorithm, which is used to allocate post season bids to both colleg and club ultimate teams. The data was obtained by scraping USAU's score reporting website. Learn more about the algorithm here. TL;DR, here is the rating function. Every game a team plays gets a rating equal to the opponents rating +/- the score value. With all these data points, we iterate team ratings until convergence. There is also a rule for discounting blowout games (see next FAQ)
For reference, here is handy table with frequent game scrores and the resulting game value:
"...if a team is rated more than 600 points higher than its opponent, and wins with a score that is more than twice the losing score plus one, the game is ignored for ratings purposes. However, this is only done if the winning team has at least N other results that are not being ignored, where N=5."

Translation: if a team plays a game where even earning the max point win would hurt them, they can have the game ignored provided they win by enough and have suffficient unignored results.