2264.82 (21)
# | Opponent | Result | Effect | Opp. Delta | % of Ranking | Status | Date | Event |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
40 | Georgia** | Win 15-5 | 0 | 99 | 0% | Ignored (Why) | Feb 11th | Queen City Tune Up1 |
187 | North Carolina-Wilmington** | Win 15-2 | 0 | 1023 | 0% | Ignored (Why) | Feb 11th | Queen City Tune Up1 |
31 | Michigan | Win 15-8 | -22.54 | 68 | 9.79% | Counts (Why) | Feb 11th | Queen City Tune Up1 |
49 | Washington University** | Win 15-4 | 0 | 57 | 0% | Ignored (Why) | Feb 11th | Queen City Tune Up1 |
4 | Carleton College | Win 10-8 | 24.92 | 14 | 9.53% | Counts | Feb 12th | Queen City Tune Up1 |
1 | North Carolina | Loss 5-12 | -10.91 | 25 | 9.4% | Counts (Why) | Feb 12th | Queen City Tune Up1 |
2 | British Columbia | Loss 8-11 | -46.08 | 39 | 12.34% | Counts | Mar 11th | Stanford Invite Womens |
23 | California-Davis | Win 10-5 | -16.03 | 26 | 10.96% | Counts (Why) | Mar 11th | Stanford Invite Womens |
19 | California-San Diego | Win 10-5 | -4.65 | 18 | 10.96% | Counts (Why) | Mar 11th | Stanford Invite Womens |
35 | UCLA** | Win 11-3 | 0 | 85 | 0% | Ignored (Why) | Mar 11th | Stanford Invite Womens |
8 | Stanford | Win 13-7 | 49.71 | 54 | 12.34% | Counts (Why) | Mar 12th | Stanford Invite Womens |
1 | North Carolina | Loss 8-12 | 7.55 | 25 | 12.34% | Counts | Mar 12th | Stanford Invite Womens |
9 | Washington | Win 11-8 | 18.58 | 37 | 12.34% | Counts | Mar 12th | Stanford Invite Womens |